|
middlekk (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
No. It doesn't.
DiggityDogg56 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
He was not removed. He resigned.
DiggityDogg56 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I did not know that selective adaptation of variation was a random process. The selective part appeared to me to imply non-randomness. As if it was a filter weeding out the noise from the information. Tending to weed out the organism when it's variation is noise and tending to pass information on to the species. Silly me. Teach me more of this purely a result of chance.
System1restored (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
As a requirement of the Darwinist imposition, a great many professors have been removed from their posts for defending the fact of Creation. The latest example of this is Michael Reiss, the former director of education at the British Royal Society, who was hastily removed from that position for suggesting that Creation also be taught in schools.
System1restored (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The DNA : )
Too small to be seen with the naked eye, DNA serves as the data bank of our cells. Information about all the living things around you is concealed within this miniaturized data bank inside every cell of every organism. All the structural characteristics of a rose, an orange, a sparrow, a tiger or a human being are present in the nuclei of the cells that comprise these organisms.
System1restored (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The evolution theory claims that the DNA &living things came into being spontaneously as the result of chance.
fergmasterflex (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Wrong. In fact, I think you would do everyone a favor if you just never posted again. Thanks!
System1restored (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The evolution theory claims that the DNA &living things came into being spontaneously as the result of chance.
Ravindra9689 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You'll recognize this best i hope, color blindness. This appears almost always in male because of the same reasons listed before. Mother has the bad X but the other compensates. Passes it on to the son who has none, just this bad one, he is color blind, now if he has a child with his sister O_o, chances are..the child..boy or girl..will be colorblind, where as normally, it would be a male who'd get it, but this new inbreeding significantly increased the chances that a female will be color blind.
Ravindra9689 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
As for the dogs, the children will inherit the same mutations, most will be benign, some will be negative. If..like i said, the brother who is XY and got the "bad" gene from his mother (And has no other X to compensate for this) Mates with his sister who has XX and one of those is bad, and they have a daughter who gets BOTH X's, screwed, and now she'll definitely pass it on to the next generation. There are many possibilities i can give you, I sure hope you're getting this. |